Advantages And Disadvantages Of Being Mistreated Essay

Not only do I, but all of us have advantages and disadvantages in our lives based on the many different aspects of who we are. Some disadvantages will outweigh the advantages greatly and vice versa. However, just because a person may have advantages in their lives, does not overthrow or deny the disadvantages in their lives. The word privilege according to the feminist mind, is easily defined as a set of unearned benefits given to people who are appropriate for a specific social group. The reason why some of us in society are allowed privilege is because of the certain aspects of our identities. The different identities of people include race, class, gender, sexual orientation, language, geographical location, ability, religion, and more. Privilege or (advantage) is simply the opposite of oppression or (disadvantage) and it is often easier to notice our disadvantages over our advantages. Why is this the case? Being mistreated is more likely to leave a bigger impression on us than whe n we are treated fairly. It is weird how this works but it is true that we tend to notice the oppression we personally experience than the privileges we experience. Every individual in society is oppressed in completely different ways and it is important to consider all the possibilities in which we are oppressed. For me, being a young woman in this world is just one oppression that I experience every day and unfortunately being a woman alone makes my life difficult at times. Oppression isShow MoreRelatedInclusion Of A Special Education Student1243 Words   |  5 Pagesown thoughts and opinions and it’s important to hear what each side has to say to help all students in education. If students with disabilities are isolated in the special education classroom, they aren’t being exposed to appropriate type of student modeling (Hill, Amy E.).† Another advantage of inclusion for a special education student, is the opportunity to make new friends and share new experiences. The student is exposed to a whole new world of students that they don’t see in their everydayRead MoreAre Athletes Treated Differently From The Rest Of The Student Body?1457 Words   |  6 Pagesmay receive preferential treatment when being on a sports team can bring them prestige amongst peers, rewards from the school, and recognition from teachers, administrators, and people in the local community. Some athletes may use their status to interact and socialize with others, since they are popular, where some unknown students may have trouble interacting due to their lack of popularity. Some athletes, who feel they are privileged, may take advantage of the system, due to their status. If athletesRead MoreWhy Women Should Be Treated By The Workplace, And The Psychology Of It All1743 Words   |  7 PagesWomen all over the world have been mistreated for more than a century. It has been exploited throughout the world as how â€Å"women aren’t currently treated the same as men in certain situations† but it is far more beyond that. Only half of the world seems to at least know what is really happening behind the curtain. Ambiguous people have manipulated the very much realness with what is exactly taking place in our society. In this essay, I will be talking about the following things; Inequity in the workplaceRead MoreEssay about Affirmative Action is Not Reverse Discrimination1293 Words   |  6 Pagesinjustices does not change this logic. If blacks were mistreated in the past for a morally irrelevant characteristic (being black), then to give them preferential treatment for the same morally irrelevant characteristic is equally indefensible. There is an error of logic here: the premise is faulty. Preferential treatment is not being given to blacks because they are black. They are being given preferential treatment because they have been mistreated. And society has a long and approved tradition ofRead MoreEssay on Unit 9 Assignment 3 Business Studies Level 3 BTEC757 Words   |  4 PagesFor M2 your leaflet also needs to include a full explanation of the advantages and disadvantages of using a professional advertising agency rather than using in-house marketing. You should include an explanation fo the following: How the use of an advertising agency like Adam Eve DDB might help Marmite to achieve the objectives of their promotional campaigns to ensure promotional success. An explanation of any disadvantages associated with Marmite’s use of a professional agency like Adam EveRead MoreAn Understanding Of Morality By Using A Social Contract Essay1795 Words   |  8 Pages Mutual-advantage contractualism is the first of these theories and argues that morality should be understood as a contract between self motivated parties. However, the disadvantages and objections to the theory have caused some philosophers to favour the second version, reasonable-agreement contractualism. Reasonable-agreement contractualism argues that a contract has developed between members of society from actions that are considered morally reasonable. However, like mutual-advantage contractualismRead MoreCaribbean History: THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF INDENTURESHIP ON THE BRITISH CARIBBEAN BETWEEN THE PERIOD OF 1838 AND 19211629 Words   |  7 Pagesin accommodation payment of passage and food. Consequently and surprisingly, there is and still are many positive an d negative effects arising out of the introduction of indentured labor in the Caribbean between the periods 1838 to 1921 (Advantages and Disadvantages of Indentured Labour in the Caribbean, 2013). The indentured laborers and the plantation owners were recipients of these positive and negative results of indentured labor. This paper will discuss some of the positive and negatives of thisRead MoreSweat Shops in Mexico Essay882 Words   |  4 Pagesimplications of having these foreign factories in Mexico do not benefit the people in the long run. Maquiladoras ignore the well-being of workers proving that they should be banned. The working conditions in the Maquiladoras endanger workers. Women workers are denied access to social, maternity, and health benefits (Woman’s Labor). Woman are at a disadvantage if they get pregnant. There are no benefits for these workers to fall back on, as soon as they get pregnant they are fired becauseRead MoreEthics : A Multi Million Online Retailing Company And Its Principles Of Operations Essay1631 Words   |  7 Pagesespecially for managers since they are the leaders and representatives of the company. Managers are responsible for hiring new employees and making sure employees adheres to the company’s ethical standards Managers have to consider the ethical decision being made and balance the interests of all stakeholders in the company. Business organizations have to contemplate how their actions impact overall society. Managers have the ability to establish their own rules pertaining to acceptable and unacceptableRead MoreIndividual Rights vs . Public Order Team Paper1952 Words   |  8 Pagesfreedoms, while that same freedom can allow people to take advantage of their freedoms. Freedom is the item that keeps the people of this country happy. People feel secure in what they are doing during their everyday lives. Public order is in place to keep society as a whole safe from misdeeds. Public order is also a system in place that restricts some freedoms that people may want. Freedoms are the ideals in life that everyone can take advantage of no matter who they are. Individual rights are the rights

Plato, Aristotle, and Moses Free Essays

â€Å"Households, cities, countries, and nations have enjoyed great happiness when a single individual has taken heed of the Good and Beautiful. Such people not only liberate themselves; they fill those they meet with a free mind. † Philo of Alexandria Athens, via Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, and Jerusalem through the Hebrew Scriptures, refer to two general and fundamental ways of life: the life of free inquiry on the one hand, the life of obedience to God’s law on the other. We will write a custom essay sample on Plato, Aristotle, and Moses or any similar topic only for you Order Now As discussed in class, the fact that most do not read the Hebrew Scriptures as a politically philosophical text, they are overlooking some fundamental political principles that are similar and complimentary to the Greeks. The book of Genesis to the end of the book of Kings is not only revelation in the form of a narrative, but can be seen as a work of reason, and political philosophy. Plato and Aristotle are certainly accepted as political philosophers, while the Patriarchs are not (widely) regarded as such. Because of this, I shall use the Pentateuch as my basis to discuss my assertion. Given the constraints of this paper, a short reflection on our assigned readings for class, and my limited knowledge of both the Hebrew Scriptures and Greek philosophy, I do not pretend for this to be sophisticated, beyond a thoughtful meditation. With a few exceptions, I shall utilize Moses’ life as the pathway through this illustration. Genesis seems a fitting place to begin. The expulsion from the Garden of Eden was the first â€Å"exodus. † In Genesis, humanity as a whole, and in Exodus, the Hebrews through their transformation into the Israelites, began a trek. They each see a perilous journey ahead as they begin fumbling toward a dimly seen goal. God, Moses, and Socrates all want what is best for His/his people. The people would rather not have it, â€Å"And they said to each other, ‘We should choose a leader and go back to Egypt. ’† A seemingly universal and consistent source of political strife, what the people want vs. what the ruler thinks is good for them. Plato’s presentation of Socrates is generally in the form of the â€Å"dialectic†. The dialectic between God and his creation is expressed frequently throughout the Scriptures. It seems much more often towards the beginning, waning through the prophets (later, waxing until the final culmination of the â€Å"dialectic† with the condemnation and crucifixion of God the Son). Adam and Eve’s questioning by the Father: â€Å"Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden. But the Lord God called to the man, â€Å"Where are you? † He answered, â€Å"I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid. And he said, â€Å"Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from? † The man said, â€Å"The woman you put here with me—she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it. † Then the Lord God said to the woman, â€Å"What is this you have done? † The woman said, â€Å"The serpent deceived me, and I ate. † Cainà ¢â‚¬â„¢s interrogation for the murder of his brother (Am I my brother’s keeper? ), Abraham’s bargaining with God over the destruction of Sodom â€Å"Will you sweep away the innocent with the guilty? Suppose there were 50 innocent people in the city? , and Moses’ unenthusiastic response to God’s command to be the standard bearer to â€Å"let His people go! † At this point in Moses’ life, he has developed a tripartite identity: a Hebrew origin, an Egyptian upbringing, and after his â€Å"exile† in Midian, he has a married and fairly sedentary lifestyle. Moses does not want to be the leader of the Hebrews out of Egypt. Like the â€Å"philosophers† in the Republic, they do not wish to rule the multitude, they must be compelled to rule. God compels Moses, through the burning bush, to â€Å"carry his cross†. When the Lord saw that he had gone over to look, God called to him from within the bush, â€Å"Moses! Moses! †Ã¢ € ¦ But Moses said to God, â€Å"Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt? † And God said, â€Å"I will be with you. And this will be the sign to you that it is I who have sent you: When you have brought the people out of Egypt, you will worship God on this mountain. Moses said to God, â€Å"Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name? Then what shall I tell them? † God said to Moses, â€Å"I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: ‘I am has sent me to you. ’† The transformation that Moses undergoes, having seen â€Å"the face of God† at the burning bush is similar to Plato’s â€Å"Analogy of the Cave†. He emerges with a mission, a calling that is to consume his life; leading the people to truth and justice. Bringing them forth from the darkness of Egypt into the light o f Canaan. Like the man who returns to the cave having seen the light, Moses’ trustablitiy is doubted many times. Moses was rejected by â€Å"his people† many times. First, by the Hebrews as he attempted to help them by killing the overseer, sending him into exile. Secondly, by the Egyptians for siding with the slaves. Thirdly, by the Israelites during his attempt to lead them safely to the Promised Land. Like the Israelites, the Athenians did not understand, or refused to accept, the teachings of Socrates, which were intended to renew private and public morality; leading to is eventual condemnation and a nightcap of hemlock. Following the death of Socrates, many of his students fled. Plato returned in an attempt to continue transformation of society and to redeem his â€Å"time†, he also failed. Moses hesitantly heads back to Egypt, to engage in his fruitless negotiation with the Pharaoh; fruitless in part due to the Lord’s â€Å"hardening of his heart†. The ultimate plague set upon the Egyptians is the Angel of Death’s reaping of the first born of each household who does not possess the mark above their doorway. This was not a simple sweeping away of children, intent on causing anguish amongst the citizens, in an attempt to incite them against the Pharaoh (that seems to have been just a bonus). It was a direct assault on the socio-political fabric of society: primogeniture upended, filial duties confused, and the vanishing of an entire generation. The Athenians feared something somewhat less immediately disruptive, the corruption of a few well-placed â€Å"youths†. Socrates’ actions were, they feared, going to destabilize Athenian society, similar to a malignancy, growing and spreading, infecting the very marrow. Moses, Plato, and Aristotle believed that there was no distinction between morality and politics. If one cannot restore order to his soul, Plato reasoned, than there can be no order in society. Just as the God of the Pentateuch understood when he gave Moses the Ten Commandments. The Decalogue presents a mix of the ordering of one’s soul (mostly the first 4) and the ordering of society in the last 6. The Greeks knew that the liberation of the soul ought to be the chief object of individuals on earth. Cleansing the soul frees humanity from the false loves and degrading appetites so that man(and women)may conform to the nomos, or the law. The nomos, not human beings, is the measure of all things. Moses was not the liberator, God was. Socrates was not the liberator- truth was. Moses and Socrates were attempting to lead the people towards liberation because they were compelled to because of the Truth. Moses and Socrates were not politicians, generals, or just â€Å"leaders†. The possessed a vision, they sought righteousness (in different ways), and pursuers of truth and virtue. Thrasymachos’ â€Å"legal positivistic† view, that objective justice does not exist for rulers, they lay down the laws with the exclusive concern for their own advantage. Plato’s refutation of this view is followed by Aristotle’s argument that even â€Å"great-souled† men are not immune to from the destructive passions associated with the spirited parts of the soul. We see in the account of David, â€Å"A man after God’s own heart†, that even he is not free from temptation or pride. Moses is not allowed to enter the Promised Land, many surmise it is because out of anger and impatience, struck a rock to produce water, instead he should have followed God’s instructions and simply spoke to the rock. While others suggest that it is his, again out of anger, breaking of the Ten Commandments. Not acting virtuously according to Aristotle’s golden mean, Moses freely chooses to act rashly out of anger, and cowardly, by refusing to allow his rebuke of the Israelites to be sufficient. Moses shows himself, in these incidents, to be lacking in virtue. Because of his â€Å"situational virtuousness† he is punished by God. In the Book of Samuel, the people of Israel clamor for a king to rule over them. Samuel approaches God with this request. The Lord, far from being a â€Å"democrat†, eventually relents: â€Å"Listen to all that the people are saying to you; it is not you they have rejected, but they have rejected me as their king. As they have done from the day I brought them up out of Egypt until this day, forsaking me and serving other gods, so they are doing to you. Now listen to them; but warn them solemnly and let them know what the king who will reign over them will claim as his rights. † Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who were asking him for a king. He said, â€Å"This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle and donkeys he will take for his own use. He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day. † Socrates, via Plato, describes the decay of the healthy city. Its decay is brought about by the emancipation of the desire for unnecessary things, i. e. , for things that are not necessary for the well being or health of the body. Thus the luxurious or feverish city emerges, the city characterized by the striving for the unlimited acquisition of wealth. Once can expect that in such a city the individuals will no longer exercise the single art for which each is meant by nature but any art or combination of the arts which is most lucrative, or that there will no longer be a strict correspondence between service and reward: hence there will be dissatisfaction and conflicts and therefore need for government which will restore justice. There will certainly be need for additional territory and hence there will be war, war of aggression. Those who clamored to Samuel for a â€Å"king† other than the King who brought them out of slavery should have read the Greeks. The story of Solomon’s rise is one of wisdom, peace, fulfillment and beauty. The decent of Solomon is one of war, oppression overindulgence, idolatry, and misery. Solomon traded away a part of Israel’s land, while annexing other’s cities (requiring him amass chariots and horsemen), enslaved the Canaanites, accumulated large amounts of gold and sliver, had relations with Egypt, married foreign women although Moses forbade it because â€Å"they would turn their hearts away from the Lord† and eventually began to worship their idols. All of this eventually ending in the destruction of Israel, leaving Judah for the â€Å"sake of David and Jerusalem†. Because of the blessing Solomon began with, and the glory he reached at his pinnacle, his fall was a much more tragic one. The Ten Commandments, and Justice define the problem associated with living in society. Their statement, however does not solve it. God gives the laws to create an ideal society, Socrates gives the vision of the ideal city. It has been painfully demonstrated, not just through the accounts of Moses, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, but the entirety of human history, that this ideal is seemingly impossible to attain. The political philosophy expressed in the early Biblical narrative, through Revelation, the Greeks will come to understand (or at lease address) through Reason. The establishment of a government (either temporal or divine), the dangers of government, the relationship between the individual to the leader/state (and the leader’s responsibilities), forms of government, and the eventual decline of the state. How to cite Plato, Aristotle, and Moses, Essay examples

Marriage and Family Studies

Question: Give a brief discussion of the effective, healthy relationship after disputes faced by every couple during their marriages. Answer: Generally it has been seen that couples relationships change as they progress through courtship and into marriage is the theme of this assignment (Skolnick Skolnick 2012). . There have been many social theories in literature that design a successful implementation of programs to expand understanding of such transitions in marriage. It will also highlight the social developmental issues which need to be developed with implementing effective interpersonal decision-making approaches. (Izard 2013). Here two stories will be discussed to understand the factors, which are important to make the transition to marriage as a successful one. In other ways, it also highlights the social consequences, which can even make such relationships a failure one resulting to manage household tasks. Therefore, such transition tends to flow with a mix of emotion, which is an important factor when the couple take individual decisions in the process of mate selection (Hogan 2013). Some people do not have the courage to go against their families as a way of handling the developmental demands of individuation, and the couple goes under the acceptable companion selection procedure. Duke and Alina have been married for the last two years. Their marriage transition process was not smooth at all because the couple has faced a lot of social barrier regarding their family boundaries and cultural differences. Due to which the couple made an effort to go against their family and finally marry each other in the year of 2014. They were judging themselves as a compatible couple after analysing their individual preferences, demand, future planning approaches and many more., Further, they have also agreed to handle all the family oriented matters together mutually to make their relationships a successful one. In March 2015, Duke has faced a huge financial crisis due to repayment of a loan from the bank, which has been taken for purchase of their new property. It affected their cost of living, and the couple faced many issues relating to negotiating how they would handle their finance. Here it is important to understand the personal requirements regarding demand for a product, or necessity of the social bindings, which are an essential part of living in a society. The couple tends to engage themselves into conflict when their projection and the actual cost of expenses differ and they face difficulties in prioritising their financial dependency to live in a society effortlessly.. She failed to understand that it could have made their future insecure because Duke is the only earning member of their family and no other financial supports were available. Therefore, the couple is internally connected not only for their emotional attachment, but Alina is also dependent upon Duke financially. How ever, after several conflicts, they successfully made a plan to manage the financial demand to handle the monthly expenses. Firstly, they had taken a decision to minimise the luxurious expenses and tried to concentrate more on investment options. Alina gave her full support to improvise the pattern of interaction and helped to find the happiness with the help of existing resources. A better understanding with each other would have been helpful for them to make strategies to execute their marital and family system tasks seamlessly. They have learnt from their relationship dynamics how to manage issues after their journey started as a couple with passage of time., Sam and Lucy got married in 2013.The young couple had different dreams for their new life. However, they realised that the world was something different they had individual viewpoints respectively which eventually landed up into trouble. Sam was a new employee in a new company and Lucy worked as an employee in a local store. Both had different job profiles and were quite busy with their own schedules. This took the turn in their marriage. They went on missing on some very basic family duties as individuals and often landed up in some silly quarrel amongst themselves. Initially, they had chalked out plans about household chores between them, however that routine was hardly followed. They would often blame each other for not meeting the household activities which degraded the quality of their relationship. . Instead of finding solutions to problems they blamed each other for not performing the others activities. This exasperated the situation, and they would often land up in sleepless nights after some really bad quarrels. Both Sam and Lucy failed to understand that a family foundation rests only on individuals conscious approach and sense of responsibility towards the family. This very lack of understanding and a rare sense of own approach towards the situation didnt prove any good. One day they decided for separation only to get rid of the situation. However, this young couple didnt think twice that problem lied within them only and they are the only two who could have found out solutions to all problems. If they had thought of a solution to the very meagre problems in households they would have been a happy couple like many others in this world. Therefore, the above case studies indicates that the soul partner selection and sustainability of that relationship are two different things. The marriage institution is a social affair which has many elements, and thus human beings tend to get influenced to adopt them while maintaining their relationships. A sense of adaptability and certain adjustment can ensure a successful transition to thinking not only individual perspective but also a sense of togetherness after they start their journey as a couple (Waite Spine 2011). References: Hogan, P. C. (2013). The mind and its stories: Narrative universals and human emotion. Cambridge University Press. Izard, C. E. (2013). Human emotions. Springer Science Business Media. Skolnick, A. S., Skolnick, J. H. (2012). Family in transition: rethinking marriage sexuality child rearing and family organization. Waite, L. J., Spine, G. D. (2011). Young womens transition to marriage. Demography, 18(4), 681-694.